Legal Opinion

Howard National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The defendant issued its policy insuring the plaintiff to the amount of $15,000 against loss through the dishonesty of Frank ~W, Elliott, its employee. This action is brought to recover on that policy. The original complaint contained the common counts in assumpsit, only, and no specifica*466tion was filed with the writ. Sometime after the suit was entered in court, the defendant moved for a specification, and later on, the. plaintiff, without the consent of the defendant or prior leave of the court, filed a specification showing that a recovery was claimed on the defendant’s policy No. 604594,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cole v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Patterson's Admr. v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Tripp v. Vermont Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
  4. Schlitz v. Lowell Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Columbian Granite Co. v. W. C. Townsend & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Powell v. RockwellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Powell & Powell v. Greenleaf & CurrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Shaw v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Town of Randolph v. LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API