Howard National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The defendant issued its policy insuring the plaintiff to the amount of $15,000 against loss through the dishonesty of Frank ~W, Elliott, its employee. This action is brought to recover on that policy. The original complaint contained the common counts in assumpsit, only, and no specifica*466tion was filed with the writ. Sometime after the suit was entered in court, the defendant moved for a specification, and later on, the. plaintiff, without the consent of the defendant or prior leave of the court, filed a specification showing that a recovery was claimed on the defendant’s policy No. 604594,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cole v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Patterson's Admr. v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Tripp v. Vermont Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
- Schlitz v. Lowell Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Columbian Granite Co. v. W. C. Townsend & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CaplanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Powell v. RockwellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Powell & Powell v. Greenleaf & CurrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Shaw v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Town of Randolph v. LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.