Pieniazek v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Judge ALLARD.
Stanly Pieniazek was found competent to stand trial following a competency hearing before Fairbanks Superior Court Judge Michael P. McConahy. A jury later found Pien-iazek guilty of two counts of third-degree assault 1 for shooting a gun at two state troopers after they responded to a report of a disturbance at Pieniazek’s property in Fairbanks.
On appeal, Pieniazek argues that the superior court erred in determining that he was competent to stand trial. For the reasons explained here, we agree with Pieniazek that the superior court misapplied the factors listed in AS…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Donald JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- James Richard Odle v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Washington v. Matthew Sean McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018