Legal Opinion

Shell Petroleum Corporation v. Ward

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1939No. 8794PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for the title and possession of 5.6 acres of land, occupied by a right of way for an irrigation canal. The claim was that though included within the metes and bounds, it had been excepted out, of a conveyance plaintiffs had made. The defense was that referred to in the deed as “taken up by the rights of way of the Neches Canal Company’s lateral” it had been excepted not from the conveyance, but only from the warranties.

The District Judge took plaintiffs’ view as to the construction and effect of the instruments in question, the right of way deed from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Curdy v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  4. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Haines v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. City Motel, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API