Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur Lloyd Stone

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1969No. 26867PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Following his plea of guilty to transporting a stolen automobile in interstate commerce in violation of Title 18, U.S. C.A. § 2312, and concealing it in violation of § 2313, Stone was sentenced to a term of three years on each count with the sentences to run consecutively. He appeals from the denial of his motion in arrest of judgment made pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Crim.P. We affirm. 1

Although Stone was originally indicted in the Northern District of Mississippi, his case was transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana pursuant to Rule 20, F.R.Crim.P. At his arraignment, Stone requested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Obie Diah Strother v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Larry A. OsumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Elaine Marshall v. J. Marshall, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API