Legal Opinion

Schmucker v. Naugle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1967No. Appeal, 273PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Eagen,

On July 7, 1964, John Schmucker (appellant) instituted this action of trespass to recover compensation for personal injury suffered on March 9, 1958, through the alleged negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant, John Naugle, while on the business of the other defendant, the Daniel Boone Council, Boy Scouts of America. In proper pleadings the defendants raised, inter alia, the statute of limitations as a defense. Subsequently, a voluntary nonsuit was suffered as to the Boy Scout Council, and the case proceeded to trial against the remaining defendant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Walters v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Walker v. MummertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Haines v. FitzgeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API