Legal Opinion
Rubio v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 18, 1984No. 82-AB-2053; CA A26813PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Claimant is a Mexican national who received unemployment compensation after the termination of his employment in Hermiston. After a hearing the referee issued a reimbursement order, holding that claimant was not entitled to benefits and requiring him to repay the overpayment from future benefits. The referee found that, because claimant was not legally authorized to work in the United States until July 20, 1981, his earnings in 1981 before that date could not be considered in determining his benefits. The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) affirmed the referee, one member dissenting. Claimant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- St. Francis Hospital v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Papadopoulos v. ShangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Shang v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- South Nassau Communities Hospital v. D'EliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cruz v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Industrial Commission v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Gillar v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Antillon v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Castillo v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.