Legal Opinion

State v. Ivie

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1998No. Nos. 64959-6; 64967-7PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

This is a direct discretionary review of driving-while-under-the-influence-of-alcohol prosecutions against two Navy enlisted men, James E. Ivie and Steve Taylor. Because both had been previously punished in a “captain’s mast” proceeding before their naval commanding officer, the district court dismissed pending charges pursuant to RCW 10.43.040 which bars a criminal prosecution in Washington if another sovereign has already prosecuted the defendant for the same offense. The State, however, appealed to the superior court which reversed the dismissal. But we reverse the superior court, affirm…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. GammonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. IvieWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API