Legal Opinion
Renteria v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 11, 2006No. CIV 05-532-TUC-CKJPublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JORGENSON, District Judge.
On May 16, 2006, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 25] in which he recommended Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 9] be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs and Defendant have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiffs have filed a response to Defendant’s Objection. Plaintiffs have requested oral argument. The Court finds, however, resolution of the issues is appropriate without oral argument.
The Magistrate Judge has set forth the factual background and this Court will not repeat it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Block v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Ader v. Simonmed Imaging Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Perlas v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Spencer v. DHI Mortg. Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.