Legal Opinion

Keen & Woolf Oil Co. v. Fulenwider

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1926No. 7534Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The Keen & Woolf Oil Company, appellant, brought this suit against Robert Fulenwider, appellee, to recover the sum of $849.79, with interest and protest fees; being the amount of Fulenwider’s unpaid “trade acceptance” covering the purchase price of a carload of oils sold to him by the oil company. The validity or amount of this obligation was not questioned by ap-pellee, and judgment thereon was rendered against him in appellant’s favor. But appel-lee urged a cross-action against appellant for $773.68, or $337.64 in the alternative, as damages for breach of a contract alleged to have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. San Antonio Rapid Transit Street Railway Co. v. LimburgerTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. El Paso Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Tyler Ice Co. v. Coupland & NormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Ft. Smith Couch & Bedding Co. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API