Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Lawrie

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1954No. 11888_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

In a personal injury case arising out of a collision between an automobile and a tractor, the jury’s verdict was no cause of action. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that the jury, in arriving at its verdict, considered incompetent documentary evidence that was neither introduced nor offered by either party during the trial. The motion for a new trial was denied and appellant, in this court, seeks reversal of the judgment of no cause of action and a new trial on the same grounds upon which he based his motion for a new trial before the district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Sreet Railroad & Tel. Companies v. SimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. ImbragugliaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1947

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Beverly Hills Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Marion Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Lanza v. PorettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles Football ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Arthur Krause v. James A. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API