Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Indiana Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00937Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KYLE CHANDLER, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-937-JD-JPK INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Kyle Chandler, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API