Legal Opinion

Aiken v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Criminal law. Indictment. Forgery. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

There were two counts in the indictment. The first charged the accused with the forgery of an instrument of which the following is a copy:

“November 27th, 1891.
“Mr. J. S. Vinson: Please let the bearer have three dollars, and I will pay' you Monday. Oblige a friend,
“J. S. Renfroe.”

The second, calling the offence “forgery,” charged the accused with designedly attempting, by color of the above copied instrument, designated as a counterfeit letter or writing and fully set forth, to obtain from one Vinson three dollars, with intent to defraud him of the money, but that the accused…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Couch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  3. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brusnighan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Lummus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API