Legal Opinion

Manchaca v. Chater

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 6, 1996No. 9:90cv81PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEARTFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs 1 have alleged a failure by Social Security Administration (SSA) offices in Texas to fulfill certain duties imposed by the Food Stamp Act. The parties have reached a compromise and have submitted it to the court for approval. The court now approves this settlement. 2

BACKGROUND

1. “The Food Stamp program provides low-income households with assistance to obtain a more nutritious diet.” Documentary App. in Supp. of Pls.’ Mot. for Partial Summ. J. at 5 [hereinafter Doc.App.] (copy of GAO, Social Security: Need for Better Coordination of Food…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. William REED, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and United Auto Workers, Local Union 276, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Parker v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Bowen v. GalbreathSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ahearn v. Fibreboard Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
  5. In Re New Mexico Natural Gas Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heit v. Van OchtenDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. State v. Sprint Communications Co., LPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Celeste v. Intrusion Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2022
  4. John L. Soileau v. Churchill Downs Louisiana Horseracing Company, L.L.C.,. Churchill Downs Louisiana Video Poker Company, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Smith v. Kforce Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API