Legal Opinion
Heit v. Van Ochten
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 8, 2001No. 1:96-cv-00800PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on three Motions by Plaintiff, all of which the Court will dispose of in this Opinion. Plaintiff filed (1) a Motion for Permission to Withdraw as Counsel for Richard Heit, (2) a Motion to Add Named Plaintiff, and (3) a Motion for Approval of the Proposed Settlement Agreement. Defendants have filed a Brief Concurring in Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of the Proposed Settlement. The Court grants Plaintiffs Motions.
BACKGROUND
This case began in 1996 when Plaintiff Richard Heit and two other individuals filed a Complaint on “behalf of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- IUE-CWA v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Nunez v. Bae Sys. San Diego Ship Repair Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Olden v. LaFarge Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.