Legal Opinion

Morehead v. Roehm

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1931No. Docket No. 503PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondents are husband and wife, as are appellants. At about 6 o’clock on the afternoon of May 21, 1930, Freda Morehead was injured in a collision between an automobile which she was driving and one being driven by Sadie A. Roehm, at the intersection of Newport Road and East First Street, public roads in Orange County. Newport Road runs in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction and is intersected from the west by First Street at an angle of about forty-five degrees. First Street terminates in Newport Road. At the time of the accident there was a boulevard stop sign on East First Street…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Thomas v. German Gen. Benevolent Soc'yCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gayton v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Grasso v. CunialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Stafford v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Kellner v. WitteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Gomez v. LindbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API