Legal Opinion
(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 1, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00839Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHEILA HALOUSEK, Case No. 2:23-cv-839-KJM-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO 13 v. AMEND, AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART 14 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ AND DENY IN PART RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., 15 (ECF No. 11) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Shiela Halousek, who is proceeding in forma pauperis, asserts claims 18 against Defendant California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) and the 19 State of California related to her pension…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.