Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Barker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
This is a suit in trespass for damage to appellee’s building allegedly caused by appellant’s maintenance and operation of a spur track. The jury awarded appellee $1,-500. On this .appeal the significant question is whether or not appellant was entitled to a directed verdict.
In 1891, under a recorded grant, appellant constructed a spur track on land owned by appellee’s predecessor in title. The initial objective was to provide direct railroad transportation of freight to and from the grantors’ lumber yard, mill and stave works. This spur has been used continuously since the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mitchell v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Attorney General v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Pittsburg & K. Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Ferguson v. Covington & C. El. Railroad & Transfer & Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Suppinger v. CaplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cameron v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- City of Williamstown v. RubyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Caudill v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964