Legal Opinion

De Hart v. Illinois Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 10, 1940No. 7399PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant disputes liability solely on the ground that the assured, Roin, failed to cooperate with it in “securing information, furnishing evidence and attendance of witnesses” in the trial of the original action.

Among other clauses, the insurance policy provided:

“No action shall lie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, the assured shall have fully complied with all the conditions hereof. * * *.”
“Assured shall render to the Company full cooperation and assistance in securing information, furnishing evidence and the attendance of witnesses.”
“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paschen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Prentiss v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Henjes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Meyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API