Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanders

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 2, 2002No. 01-5075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Carrie S. Sanders appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Hester Sanders and Helen R. Stiefel in this interpleader action filed by the United States of America. Appellant argues that the district court erred in applying state law to determine the effectiveness of a change of beneficiary made by a guardian for an incompetent, insured veteran on an insurance policy issued under the National Service Life Insurance (NSLI) program. 38 U.S.C. § 1904. After review, we affirm.

I

While in the U.S. Army during World War II, Marvin Sanders purchased two NSLI policies.…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2005
  2. United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API