Legal Opinion

People v. Roman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 2017No. Supreme Court Case 15SC568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

¶1 In 2006, respondent Eloisa Roman pled guilty to criminal impersonation and received a two-year deferred judgment. In 2008, she successfully completed her deferred judgment and her plea was withdrawn and the case was dismissed. In 2013, she filed a motion 'under Crim. P. 32(d) seeking to withdraw her plea based on an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied her motion, reasoning that there was no plea to withdraw under Rule 32(d). The court of appeals reversed, holding that Rule 32(d) authorized the district court to withdraw Roman’s previously-withdrawn plea.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KruseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Espino-Paez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Espino-Paez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API