People v. Roman
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
¶1 In 2006, respondent Eloisa Roman pled guilty to criminal impersonation and received a two-year deferred judgment. In 2008, she successfully completed her deferred judgment and her plea was withdrawn and the case was dismissed. In 2013, she filed a motion 'under Crim. P. 32(d) seeking to withdraw her plea based on an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied her motion, reasoning that there was no plea to withdraw under Rule 32(d). The court of appeals reversed, holding that Rule 32(d) authorized the district court to withdraw Roman’s previously-withdrawn plea.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KruseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Espino-Paez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Espino-Paez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017