Legal Opinion

Espino-Paez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 2017No. Supreme Court Case 14SC957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

¶1 Petitioner Jose Espino-Paez pled guilty to the use of a schedule II controlled substance in 1996 and received a deferred judgment. When he successfully completed the terms of his deferred judgment, his guilty plea was withdrawn and the charge was dismissed with prejudice.

¶2 In 2012, Espino-Paez filed a petition for postconviction- relief pursuant to Crim. P. 35(c) and in the alternative to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to Crim. P. 32(d). The district court denied that motion, and the court of appeals affirmed, holding that the district court had no authority to withdraw the plea…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. People v. RomanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Corrales-CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Flores-Heredia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. People v. RomanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Zafiro-Guillen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API