Legal Opinion

Clifton Rhone v. United States of America, John S. Wilson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 21, 1966No. 19531_1PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Clifton Rhone and John Wilson were jointly indicted, tried and convicted for robbery, assault with a dangerous weapon and concealment of a dangerous weapon. On this appeal they argue that their arrests were invalid and that the District Court erred by not suppressing evidence seized at the time. We think the record reveals adequate probable cause to support the arrest and therefore the challenged “fruits” of the arrest were properly admitted at trial.

Appellant Wilson further argues that he was prejudiced by a joinder of his case with that of Rhone and that the District Court erred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Harold S. Cross v. United States of America, John L. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API