Commonwealth v. Martin
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
This appeal raises the issue of the circumstances under which the question of a defendant’s competence to stand trial requires an evidentiary hearing pursuant to G. L. c. 123, § 15, as appearing in St. 1986, c. 599. Section 15(a) authorizes a court house examination of a defendant to be conducted by “one or more qualified physicians or psychologists” and § 15(c) provides that “[a]t the conclusion of the examination . . . [the examiner] shall forthwith give to the court written signed reports of . . . findings bearing on the issue of competence to stand trial.” Next, § 15(if) instructs that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PaintenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. WentworthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. SciontiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. DeBerardinisMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.