Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martin

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 30, 1993No. 92-P-538PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

This appeal raises the issue of the circumstances under which the question of a defendant’s competence to stand trial requires an evidentiary hearing pursuant to G. L. c. 123, § 15, as appearing in St. 1986, c. 599. Section 15(a) authorizes a court house examination of a defendant to be conducted by “one or more qualified physicians or psychologists” and § 15(c) provides that “[a]t the conclusion of the examination . . . [the examiner] shall forthwith give to the court written signed reports of . . . findings bearing on the issue of competence to stand trial.” Next, § 15(if) instructs that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PaintenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. WentworthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. SciontiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. DeBerardinisMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API