Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scionti

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 15, 2012No. 10-P-828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgnes, J.

The defendant, Michael Scionti, appeals from his conviction of assault and battery on a correction officer. The two issues raised on appeal are whether he was competent to stand trial and, if so, whether he was denied due process of law when the judge conducted the jury trial without his presence in the court room. We affirm because there was an adequate evidentiary basis for the judge’s determination that the defendant was competent and, due to his obstreperous and threatening behavior, the defendant forfeited his right to be present in the court room during trial.

Factual background. This is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. HaltiwangerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
  4. Commonwealth v. TeixeiraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API