Legal Opinion

Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 2008No. 1-05-1700PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia

The plaintiff, William Oldenstedt, sued the defendant, Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc. (Erdman), after he injured his back at a construction site. At the time of the injury, Oldenstedt was employed by third-party defendant Brongiel Plumbing (Brongiel), with which Erdman had subcontracted. The trial court granted Brongiel’s motion for a directed verdict and the jury subsequently returned a verdict in Oldenstedt’s favor. On appeal, Erdman contends it is entitled to a new trial because Oldenstedt’s rebuttal closing argument was “slanderous and grossly prejudicial,” the trial court erroneously…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Bruntjen v. Bethalto Pizza, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. Colella v. JMS Trucking Co. of Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Petraski v. ThedosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People v. BeauchampAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API