Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia
The plaintiff, William Oldenstedt, sued the defendant, Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc. (Erdman), after he injured his back at a construction site. At the time of the injury, Oldenstedt was employed by third-party defendant Brongiel Plumbing (Brongiel), with which Erdman had subcontracted. The trial court granted Brongiel’s motion for a directed verdict and the jury subsequently returned a verdict in Oldenstedt’s favor. On appeal, Erdman contends it is entitled to a new trial because Oldenstedt’s rebuttal closing argument was “slanderous and grossly prejudicial,” the trial court erroneously…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Bruntjen v. Bethalto Pizza, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Colella v. JMS Trucking Co. of Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Petraski v. ThedosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. BeauchampAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.