Legal Opinion

City of Pikeville v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 9, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

T. M. Riddell was the owner of a house and lot in the city of Pikeville. In the year 1914 the city opened up, excavated and graded a street above and adjoining his premises. The work was done in such a manner as to divert the natural flow of the water and cause it to flow over and injure Riddle’s premises.

In the year 1917 Riddle sued the city for damages. The first trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in his favor for $1,000.00. The city appealed and obtained a reversal of the judgment. City of Pikeville v. Riddle, et al., 191 Ky. 231, 230 S. W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. City of Pikeville v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  3. Humphrey v. MansbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Anderson v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API