Legal Opinion
(HC) Michael N. Chisom v. Madera County
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 17, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01368Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL NARVELLE CHISOM, No. 1:21-cv-01368-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE REMEDIES 14 MADERA COUNTY, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER 15 Respondent. LEAVE TO AMEND RESPONDENT 16 [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE] 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 19 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on 20 September 13, 2021.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.