Legal Opinion
Heiser v. Union Carbide Corp
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 30, 2004No. 02-6311Unknown
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Ball, et al. v. Union Nos. 02-6289/6311 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0334A (6th Cir.) Carbide Corp., et al. File Name: 04a0334a.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS COUNSEL FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ARGUED: Edmund L. Carey, Jr., BARRETT, JOHNSTON _________________ & PARSLEY, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellants. Christopher Landau, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, Washington, FANNIE BALL , et al. X D.C., John T. Buckingham, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES (02-6289); STEPHEN HEISER, - ATTORNEY, Knoxville, Tennessee, for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.