Legal Opinion
Kromeich v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 12, 1994No. 1-92-0688PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda
Plaintiff, Raymond L. Kromeich, brought a replevin action to recover nine firearms seized by the Chicago police pursuant to chapter 8 — 20 of the Chicago Municipal Code (Chicago Municipal Code ch. 8 — 20 (1990)). The circuit court entered a judgment in favor of the City of Chicago (City). On appeal, plaintiff asserts that (1) municipal ordinance section 8 — 20—040(b)(5) (Chicago Municipal Code § 8 — 20— 040(b)(5) (1990)) is void for vagueness; (2) municipal ordinance section 8 — 20—220 (Chicago Municipal Code § 8 — 20—220 (1990)) is unconstitutional on its face in that it gives unlawful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. EspositoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. $8,450 United States CurrencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- City of Chicago v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- City of Chicago v. HaworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- People v. HalawaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- City of Chicago v. HaworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.