Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Krancer
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-1458PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Linda L. Kelly1 (Doc. 10) and Defendants Michael L. Krancer and Robert F. POWLESON (Doc. 21). Because Plaintiff Dr. Alfonso Rodriguez, M.D. (“Plaintiff’) lacks standing to bring this case, both Motions to Dismiss will be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
BACKGROUND
The facts as alleged by Plaintiff in his Complaint (Doc. 1) are as follows:
Plaintiff is a nephrologist, a physician specializing in the treatment of renal diseases, hypertension, and advanced…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodriguez v. AbruzzoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014