Legal Opinion

Stanovick v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Absent a timely motion to strike a note of issue or statement of readiness, a party is foreclosed from further discovery unless there is a demonstration of special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances to justify a departure from the rule foreclosing further discovery after the statement of readiness has been filed (Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038, 1039; see also, Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v Pomeroy Real Estate Corp., 74 AD2d 734, appeal dismissed 50 NY2d 842). This result obtains…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Pomeroy Real Estate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Burnett Process, Inc. v. Richlar Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glionna v. Kubota, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Joseph v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. 10 Park Square Associates, Inc. v. TravelersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API