Legal Opinion
Glionna v. Kubota, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiffs motion to serve a second amended and supplemental bill of particulars, even though plaintiff had filed the note of issue and certificate of readiness nearly two months earlier, because plaintiff demonstrated that special circumstances existed which supported the grant of this relief (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; cf., Stanovick v Donner-Hanna Coke Corp., 116 AD2d 1000; Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 AD2d 1038; Gardner v Fyr-Fyter Co., 55 AD2d 816). Moreover, on this record,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Stanovick v. Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeannette S. v. WilliotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Ellis v. J.M.G., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Blake v. WieczorekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Stewart v. DunklemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Allen v. BraxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.