Legal Opinion

Lhotka v. Geographic Expeditions, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 2010No. A123725PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

—Geographic Expeditions, Inc. (GeoEx), appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of a wrongful death action brought by the survivors of one of its clients who died on a Mount Kilimanjaro hiking expedition. GeoEx contends the trial court erred when it ruled that the agreement to arbitrate contained in GeoEx’s release form was unconscionable. Alternatively, GeoEx contends that if the court correctly concluded the arbitration clause was unconscionable, the court abused its discretion in striking the clause in its entirety rather than severing the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Wherry v. Award, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API