Du Rocher v. Teutonia Motor Car Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
The defendant strenuously contends that the plaintiff, in entering through the doorway and in crossing the platform at the head of the stairway in the manner *211as shown by the evidence, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; that its. motion for judgment’after verdict should have been granted; and that the judgment in the instant case should be reversed and the plaintiff’s complaint dismissed.
The safe-place statutes, and the public-building- statutes contained in ch. 101 of the Statutes were enacted for the purpose of protecting human life, limb, and health. In order to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bedell v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Massey v. SellerOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Gaffney v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Besnys v. Herman Zohrlaut Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Hommel v. Badger State Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Brusseau v. SelmoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Erickson v. McKayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.