Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Cumberland Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided October 15, 1843PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Action on the case for flowing back the water of the river Presumpscot, in the town of Gorham, Maine, to the injury of the rights of the plaintiff [Oliver M. Whipple], as a riparian proprietor, and also to the injury and obstruction of the plaintiff’s mills, situated at or near Gambo Falls, on the same river.

Read the full summary

Action on the case for flowing back the water of the river Presumpscot, in the town of Gorham, Maine, to the injury of the rights of the plaintiff [Oliver M. Whipple], as a riparian proprietor, and also to the injury and obstruction of the plaintiff’s mills, situated at or near Gambo Falls, on the same river. The declaration contained various counts, alleging the gravamen in various ways, in some of which the injury was asserted to be by flowing back the water, so as to obstruct the plaintiff’s mills in their due operation, and in others, an injury also to the lands of the plaintiff, as a…

1Opinion of the Court

STORY, Circuit Justice,

in summing up to the jury, after stating the various facts offered in evidence by the parties, said; The real question between the parties is, whether the water is now flowed back by the defendants upon the plaintiff’s lands and mills, or upon either of them, higher and further than the Knight dam had formerly flowed it back. One means of ascertaining this is to ascertain whether the new dam, now erected on the Knight dam, is higher than the old dam; for if it is, that will, of itself, afford a strong inference, that the water is flowed back higher and further; for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coffin v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Uzuegbunam v. PreczewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API