Legal Opinion

In re Settlement Capital Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Patricia E Satterfield, J.

Petitioner Settlement Capital Corporation (SCC) makes the instant application, pursuant to General Obligations Law, article *4475, title 17, known as the Structured Settlement Protection Act (SSPA), for the approval of transfer of certain rights vested in Richard C. Ballos under a structured settlement funded by Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance Company. Pursuant to a purchase and sales agreement executed by him on January 21, 2003, Ballos transferred to SCC his rights to $125,000 of the $225,000 annuity that will become payable to him on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Grieve v. General American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1999
  3. In re Settlement Funding of New York L.L.C.New York Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re Settlement Capital Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. in Re J. Rains, Annuitant, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  2. In re Settlement FundingNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re 321 Henderson Receivables Limited PartnershipNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  4. 321 Henderson Receivables, L.P. v. MartinezNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  5. M & T Mortgage Corp. v. FoyNew York Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API