Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Fant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1925No. 13973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD. C.

The parties will be referred to .herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, J. R. Fant, brought action against the defendants, R. L. Buchanan, J. W. Runyons, W. W. Brown, John A. Haste, and P. W. Jones, seeking recovery on ,a promissory .note for the sum of $3,000, dated January 21, 1921, payable August 1, 1921, with interest from maturity at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, payable semiannually, and for an attorney’s fee of $300 as provided by the said note. The defendants answered by general denial, and by a plea that there had been a usurious…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnett v. TaborSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. In Re Guardianship of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Dorchester v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Portwood v. Town of SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Colburn v. SnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API