Blair v. Craddock
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Morton district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
Blair, as the holder of the patent title, recovered in ejectment against Craddock, the holder of a tax deed, who appeals.
At a certain stage of the proceedings Blair had pending an action of ejectment against Craddock, who was in possession of the land, and Craddock had *103pending an action to quiet his title against Blair. By-consent of the parties the two actions were con-consolidated. Blair took leave to file an answer “in lieu of his petition” in the ejectment case. In this answer he abandoned his claim for affirmative relief, contented…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kennedy v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Gibson v. TrislerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Hillyer v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claussen v. AmbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Solomon v. LamplSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Hinnen v. ArtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Hendrix v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926