Legal Opinion

Malone v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 7278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Emir from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Susie Tiger Malone and others against Peer Scott and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error, to recover the lands, and to remove clouds upon the title thereof, described in the petition. The lands in question were the allotment of Ullie Eagle, deceased, a full-blood Creek citizen. There were several interveners, and cross-petitions were fi.ed which we deem unnecessary to recite, other than the cross-petition filed by L. W. Jones, as guardian ad litem of the defendant. Hepsie Mitchell, an incompetent, in which said cross-petition it was alleged that Hepsie Mitchell was the sole…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler LinotypeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Thompson v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Bowels v. CooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Billy v. Unknown Heirs of GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. WinstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API