Legal Opinion

State, Department of Fish & Game v. Kacyon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2001No. S-9433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Statute 28.30.015(g) provides that when an employee's representative recovers damages in a suit against a third party, the representative must reimburse the employer for workers' compensation benefits the employer has paid. 1 The "excess" recovery may be retained by the personal representative but it must be credited against the employer's obligation to make compensation payments in the future. But the employer must pay its pro rata share of the representative's costs and attorney's fees as measured by both the reimbursement for past payments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Horsford v. Estate of HorsfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ora Lee Bell v. Stephen O'hearne, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Labor, Bureau of Employees Compensation, Fifth Compensation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. Matter of Estate of BrandonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clement v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Atkins v. Inlet Transportation & Taxi Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Clement v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API