Cunningham v. Zane

The respondent, Cunningham, was employed by the appellants, Zane, as the caretaker of their farm, at a consideration of $60 per month. In this action, he sought to recover a balance claimed to be due for the services. There was a trial by jury and a verdict returned in favor of the respondent, on which the court, after making certain deductions with the consent of the respondent, entered a judgment in his favor.

The principal question urged on the appeal is that the evidence does not justify the verdict. But we find substantial evidence in its support. A reading of the evidence, it may be…