Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Van Woerden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1935No. 25208. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover from the defendants sums alleged to be due him, for services as ranch foreman and as assignee of the claims of other farm laborers employed by defendants on the ranch. The complaint also included an uncontested claim for a small sum advanced by plaintiff on defendants ’ account for merchandise. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and from findings and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

The appellants purchased a ranch in the Ephrata district, embracing about two hundred acres, one hundred of which was in cultivation, forty acres…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JeffsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Cunningham v. ZaneWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. CoffeyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. McCoy v. CourtneyWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API