Legal Opinion

Yetter v. Commeau

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1974No. 42793PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

— This is an appeal from the dismissal, on a pretrial motion, of a petition filed under the provisions of the uniform reciprocal enforcement of' support act (URESA), RCW 26.21, seeking support for an allegedly illegitimate child. The primary question presented is: May the factual question of paternity, as a prelude to a duty of child support, be resolved in a URESA proceeding?

The trial judge answered in the negative and dismissed the petition. We disagree, reverse and remand.

The operative circumstances, as gleaned from the brief record, are: On September 18, 1972, Ms. Roberta Yetter filed a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WoodWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Greenstreet v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API