Legal Opinion

Fleming v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2002No. 1D01-2734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the appellant’s crimes occurred within the window period established by Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924, 928 (Fla.2000), the appellant claims an entitlement to resen-tencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620, 627 (Fla.2000). The sentence received by the appellant was an upward departure of the 1995 guidelines, supported by valid written reasons. In Hope v. State, 797 So.2d 1252 (Fla.2001), the Florida Supreme Court held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Trapp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Hope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. State v. LemonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Fleming v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API