Legal Opinion

Fleming v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 2006No. 1D05-3411PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals his sentence entered after resentencing pursuant to the 1994 sentencing guidelines, alleging that the trial court scored 40 points for severe victim injury without a jury finding, and made an upward departure based in part on three grounds found by the trial court and not the jury in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). Additionally, appellant argues that the fourth reason for departure is facially invalid. Because the State concedes error…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Galindez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Behl v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. Reginald Lee Booker, I I I v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Fleming v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API