Legal Opinion

JONES v. PENCOYD IRON WORKS, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2019No. 2:18-cv-04157Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN JONES, Case No. 2:18-CV-04157-JDW Plaintiff, v. PENCOYD IRON WORKS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM Stephen Jones has moved for summary judgment on a counterclaim from Pencoyd Iron Works, Inc. asserting claims under a Pennsylvania statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 2503(9), that prohibits attorneys from acting in a manner that is arbitrary, vexatious, or in bad faith. The Parties’ briefs spar over whether the facts in the record support such a claim. The Court, however, raised a question of whether Section 2503(9) applies…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API