Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. Ellis Green Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice (after stating the facts as above).
1. The first point presented is the theft of the car was not covered by the policy, because the salesman Boren had authority to surrender the possession of the car to Smythe, and voluntarily did so. All of the *296evidence shows Boren had no express authority to surrender cars to prospective pur-' chasers for demonstration unless he or some other representative of the assured went with the car; that his action in this instance was contrary to the order of his employer, and he was immediately discharged for disobeying such order.
Implied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Home Ins. Co. v. KetcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- American Indemnity Co. v. HiggenbothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Stuart Motor Co. v. General Exchange Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- American Standard County Mut. Ins. Co. v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Smith v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Smither v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- QUEEN INSURANCE COMPANY v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.