Legal Opinion
Juve v. Home Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1981No. 387, 51097 and 51170PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
The respondents in this ease are seeking coverage for Jerome M. Kunza under an insurance policy issued to the city of Per-ham by the Home Indemnity Company, the two appellants. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of respondents, declaring Kunza to be insured under the Perham policy. We vacate that judgment and order that judgment be entered in favor of the city of Perham and Home Indemnity Company.
Jerome M. Kunza was or may have been responsible for an automobile accident of March 20, 1976 in which the driver and three passengers of a leased vehicle…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Mutual Ins. Co. Of the District of Columbia v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Gilkey v. Andrew Weir InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Chesher v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Longsdorf v. TunsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Kresse v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Andresen v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State UniversityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Imburgia v. Salem Township Rescue Squad, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.