Legal Opinion
Mills v. City of Baton Rouge
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 12, 1946No. 38196PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Plaintiffs, as owners of certain real property, instituted this suit against the city of Baton Rouge to have declared null and void and of no force and effect a certain zoning ordinance adopted on September 27, 1944, by the Commission Council of that city, zoning the area in which their property is situated for residential purposes only and prohibiting its use for commercial purposes.
Judgment was rendered by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, decreeing the ordinance to be null and void and of no force and effect, and enjoining and restraining the city, its officers,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mansfield & Swett, Inc. v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Thibaut v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- City of Bismarck v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of CaddoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Beauvais v. DC Hall TransportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Fireside Mut. Life Ins. v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Jameson v. St. Tammany Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Herring v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.