Legal Opinion

People v. Hemmings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The People’s evidence concerning the chain of custody of the cocaine was sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the identity and unchanged condition of the evidence (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 343; People v Moyer, 186 AD2d 997; People v McIntyre, 175 AD2d 637, 638, lv denied 79 NY2d 860; People v Green, 155 AD2d 880, lv denied 75 NY2d 813). Defendant’s statement, which County Court suppressed because it was taken in violation of defendant’s Miranda rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436), was properly admitted for impeachment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. MoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. McIntyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API